Tenzin Jigmey* dwells on the role the Dalai Lama has played as a global mediator, guiding both scientists and contemplatives toward a more holistic vision of knowledge which unites the outer science of matter with the inner one of mind.
“When science and spirituality recognize their common purpose—the pursuit of truth and the well-being of all sentient beings—they will contribute together to the unfolding of human wisdom.”
— H.H. the 14th Dalai Lama
Introduction
In the late twentieth century, the Dalai Lama began working closely with leading scientists. He helped establish formal dialogues, such as the Mind and Life Institute in 1987. These meetings bring Buddhist scholars, monks, and scientists together to discuss topics such as consciousness, neuroplasticity, and reality. The Dalai Lama stands out as a religious leader because he is open to changing Buddhist beliefs if scientific evidence proves them wrong. This shows his commitment to honesty and learning.
The Dalai Lama sees many similarities between how Buddhism and science approach knowledge. Buddhism values direct experience, careful examination, and logical thinking, all of which are equally central to science. Whereas Buddhism examines inner experiences such as consciousness and suffering, science usually studies the external world. For instance, consider the experiment conducted by Davidson et al. (2004), which used EEG to study Tibetan monks during meditation. This scientific investigation into brain activity provides empirical insights into the altered states of consciousness cultivated by Buddhist practices. (Lutz et al., 2004) Bridging these perspectives, the Dalai Lama believes both approaches can work together: science helps us study the physical world, while Buddhist practice helps us understand our minds. His idea of ‘universal responsibility’ draws on both Buddhist compassion and a scientific view of interconnectedness, linking the two disciplines.
The Dalai Lama supports integrating science into Tibetan monastic education. He encourages updating traditional lessons to include subjects such as biology, physics, math, and psychology. This mix encourages monks and laypeople to think critically and learn through experience, alongside meditation and ethical studies. He has also inspired worldwide research on how meditation affects the brain and mental health. (New Research Reveals That Meditation Induces Changes in Deep Brain Areas Associated with Memory and Emotional Regulation, 2025) Building on these dialogues, the Dalai Lama’s work has helped shape the field of contemplative science, which combines meditation, personal experience, and brain research. (APJ Abdul Kalam: Contemplative Science Complements Modern Science, 2010) At the core of this exploration lies the central thesis that this dialogue between Buddhism and science fosters a holistic understanding of reality, bridging inner experience with objective inquiry. In ethics, he promotes a compassion rooted in science that reaches beyond religious boundaries. He is also interested in how quantum theory challenges traditional views of reality, relating these ideas to Buddhist teachings on emptiness and interdependence. In this essay, I explore the connection between quantum theory and Buddhism, following the Dalai Lama’s lead.
Methodological Parallels: Buddhism and Science
The Dalai Lama often highlights that Buddhism and science share a methodological foundation rooted in empiricism and systematic investigation. Both traditions prioritize direct observation, logical analysis, and evidence-based inquiry. To illustrate the distinction, imagine scientific observation as peering through a telescope, meticulously examining distant stars to unravel the universe’s mysteries. Conversely, consider Buddhist experiential insight as gazing into a mirror, reflecting on one’s own consciousness to explore the depths of the mind. In Buddhism, experiential insight (direct perception or “pratyakṣa”) takes priority over reason and scriptural testimony. This mirrors science’s commitment to empirical verification. The Dalai Lama has argued that empirical evidence, even when it contradicts ancient Buddhist cosmology, should lead to the revision or rejection of traditional doctrinal positions.
However, a key distinction lies in the domain of investigation. Science typically focuses on a third-person analysis of external phenomena through objective, measurable methods. Buddhist inquiry centers on first-person introspective exploration of consciousness. It rigorously cultivates mental states and observes subjective experience as data. This divergence raises a profound question: Can subjective data ever meet the rigor of objectivity? The Dalai Lama suggests these complementary approaches can inform one another, prompting contemplation on whether introspection and external research can truly bridge the gap. Science can benefit from finely tuned contemplative techniques, while Buddhism can remain open to new insights from external research.
This methodological conjunction, according to the Dalai Lama, encourages ongoing critical examination, mutual respect, and a shared willingness to let evidence guide our understanding of reality, whether that evidence is external or internal.
Table 1 summarizes this complementarity:
| Buddhist | Science | |
| Object of study | Consciousness, suffering, mental states | Matter, energy, biological systems |
| Method | Meditation, introspection, reasoning | Experimentation, measurement, modeling |
| Aim | Liberation from suffering | Understanding and control of natural phenomena |
| Epistemology | Dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda | Causality and empirical inference |
The Dalai Lama’s Contribution and Quantum Physics
I recall attending a specific dialogue where the Dalai Lama spoke about quantum theory, highlighting how quantum science and Buddhist ideas intersect. One moment particularly stood out when he made a striking comparison between the observer effect in quantum physics and the Buddhist concept of interdependence. This personal witness added clarity to my understanding, as he spoke with conviction about the similarities in perceiving reality through dependent origination or probabilities. Such discussions starkly contrast the deterministic view of classical Newtonian mechanics. Quantum physics dismantled that worldview, revealing a subatomic world governed by probabilities, uncertainty, and the interdependence of observer and observed. The Dalai Lama points out that these features of quantum theory echo Buddhist views on interdependence and the lack of fixed essence in all things. (Gyatso & Tenzin, 2005) In a strikingly parallel manner, Buddhist philosophy, formulated over 2,500 years ago, asserts that all phenomena are empty of inherent existence and arise only through dependent origination. The Dalai Lama engages in dialogue about the nature of reality, perception, and consciousness. While these two systems differ in scope and method, their shared challenge to naive realism offers profound insights into both science and philosophy.
I will not go deeper into the history of quantum physics, but I will introduce a bit of it as it relates to what the Dalai Lama holds. Quantum physics emerged from experiments that classical mechanics could not explain, such as the photoelectric effect, the double-slit experiment, and wave–particle duality. The Copenhagen interpreters, such as Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, hold that particles exist not as fixed entities but as probability waves until they are measured. Observation collapses the wave function into a specific outcome. (Wave function collapse, n.d.)
In a few words, quantum theory relates everything to three things:
- Superposition: A particle can exist in multiple states simultaneously.
- Entanglement: Two particles can become correlated such that the state of one instantly influences the other, even across vast distances.
- Observer effect: Measurement affects what is observed.
These discoveries in quantum physics are directly relevant to Buddhist philosophy. They suggest that reality depends, at least in part, on observation. This idea challenged Einstein, who once said, “God does not play dice with the universe.” The Dalai Lama points out that quantum theory’s focus on relationships, chance, and connection is like Buddhist ideas about dependent origination and emptiness. Both suggest that reality is shaped by conditions and is not fixed or absolute.
In the 2nd century CE, Nagarjuna states that the nature of reality is described through the concepts of Śūnyatā (emptiness). All phenomena are empty of intrinsic, independent existence and of the Pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination): Everything arises from causes and conditions; nothing exists in isolation, but this does not mean that nothing exists, rather that things exist only conventionally, as interdependent processes.
As Nāgārjuna wrote: “Whatever dependently arises, that is explained to be emptiness. That, being a dependent designation, is itself the middle way.”
The Dalai Lama always denies both substantial realism and nihilism, offering instead a relational ontology: reality as a dynamic web of interrelations, perceived through consciousness.
What is the meeting point between Quantum Physics and Buddhism?
Buddhism and quantum physics come from very different backgrounds. One is scientific and mathematical; the other is based on contemplation and experience. Still, both reject the idea that things exist on their own and instead focus on how everything is connected. They both suggest that reality is not just objective or subjective but arises from the relationship between the observer and the observed. This shared idea is at the heart of their conversation. Before moving on, consider this synthesis: how does the interplay between interconnectedness and the observer create a shared understanding across these disciplines?
Table 2
| Quantum physics | Buddhism | |
| Nature of Reality | Probabilistic; indeterminate until measured | Empty; exists only through dependent origination |
| Observer’s Role | Observation collapses wave function | Consciousness co-arises with phenomena |
| Interconnectedness | Entanglement shows nonlocal connections | All phenomena are causally interdependent |
| Objective Reality | Denied; observer-dependent | Denied; subject–object interdependence |
| Language of Description | Mathematical (wave equations, probabilities | Phenomenological (mind, perception, causation |
The dialogue between quantum physics and Buddhist philosophy was developed by the Dalai Lama, based on the ‘middle way’ principle between realism and emptiness. However, it’s important to acknowledge upfront that drawing analogies between these two fields carries
potential risks, such as oversimplifying or overstretching parallels that may not fully capture the complexity of each discipline. Highlighting such concerns enhances the credibility of the synthesis being presented. In the 1980s and 1990s, the Dalai Lama met with physicists such as David Bohm and Fritjof Capra, who echoed this synthesis, describing the universe as an undivided wholeness in flowing movement. Buddhist philosophy invites science to recognize the role of consciousness in constructing reality. In the end, both systems dissolve the illusion of separateness into two categories:
- Quantum physics unites matter and energy in probabilistic unity.
- Buddhism unites self and world through interdependence and compassion.
The Dalai Lama, Neuroscience, Psychology, and Meditation
In 1987, the Dalai Lama co-founded the Mind and Life Institute with neuroscientist Francisco Varela and entrepreneur Adam Engle. This institute became the central platform for dialogue between Buddhist scholars and Western scientists on topics such as neuroplasticity, consciousness, emotion, attention, and compassion. These dialogues evolved into collaborative research projects that empirically studied Tibetan monks and meditation practitioners using EEG, fMRI, and other brain-imaging tools.
Many studies inspired by these dialogues have shown that long-term meditation alters brain structure and function. Richard Davidson’s lab at the University of Wisconsin found that experienced meditators exhibit increased gamma wave synchrony, associated with heightened awareness and emotional stability (Lutz et al., 2004). (Lutz et al., 2004) Meditation was found to strengthen the prefrontal cortex (attention control) and reduce amygdala reactivity (stress response). Functional MRI studies revealed increased gray matter density in regions linked to empathy and self-awareness (Hölzel et al., 2011). (Hölzel et al., 2011) However, it is important to note that these studies often involve small sample sizes and may not always be replicated, underscoring the need for cautious interpretation of the results. The Dalai Lama often says these findings validate the Buddhist claim that “the mind can be trained,” emphasizing neuroplasticity as scientific evidence for mental transformation. (How Thinking Can Change the Brain, 2007) The Dalai lama always presents proudly the Buddhist Model of the Mind, which, as discussed by the Dalai Lama, offers a detailed framework for understanding cognition, emotion, and consciousness. It distinguishes between:
Primary consciousness (raw sensory awareness)
- Mental factors (feelings, perception, volition)
- Afflictive emotions (anger, attachment, ignorance)
- Wholesome states (compassion, mindfulness, wisdom)
But modern psychology, particularly positive psychology and clinical mindfulness approaches, has adopted many of these concepts in therapies such as Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). (Mindfulness-based stress reduction, n.d.)
Compassion, meditation, and Emotional Regulation
The Dalai Lama consistently emphasizes compassion training as the foundation of emotional well-being. Scientific studies have supported this by showing that compassion meditation activates brain areas linked to positive affect and social bonding, such as the insular and anterior cingulate cortex (Klimecki et al., 2013). (Klimecki et al., 2013) He often summarizes this convergence by saying, “If we cultivate compassion systematically, our brain can be reshaped toward happiness.” The Dalai Lama has encouraged neuroscientists to study consciousness not only as a neural phenomenon but as a lived, first-person experience. He has argued for a “contemplative phenomenology” that combines subjective reports of meditation with objective brain data. This approach challenges materialist assumptions in neuroscience by suggesting that consciousness might not be reducible to brain activity alone, a hypothesis he discusses in The Universe in a Single Atom (2005) (Lama, 2005).
A real-world example of compassion training’s societal relevance is its impact on healthcare professionals experiencing burnout. Studies have shown that incorporating compassion meditation into healthcare settings can reduce stress and improve well-being among healthcare workers, who often face emotionally taxing environments. (Loving-kindness meditation: a tool to improve healthcare provider compassion, resilience, and patient care, 2023) Linking the changes in brain structure and function to tangible benefits, such as reduced burnout and increased job satisfaction, reinforcing the ethical arguments for integrating compassion training more widely in society.
Conclusion
Quantum physics and Buddhist philosophy both invite humanity to transcend the illusion of solidity and separateness. They teach that the universe is not a collection of isolated entities but an interdependent web of relationships where observers and observed co-arise. By recognizing the mutual insights of these perspectives, one can appreciate how empirical and introspective approaches enrich each other, fostering a deeper understanding of reality. Quantum physics provides a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of the physical universe, while Buddhist philosophy contributes an experiential insight into the nature of consciousness and perception. While their languages differ from meditation, their shared insight is profound: reality is dynamic, relational, and empty of inherent nature.
In this dialogue, the Dalai Lama stands as a global mediator, guiding both scientists and contemplatives toward a more holistic vision of knowledge—one that unites the outer science of matter with the inner science of mind.
* Tenzin Jigmey is presently a high school chemistry teacher and an adjunct lecturer at Union County College in New Jersey. With years of experience in both education and laboratory work, he brings a unique perspective as someone who has journeyed from the Tibetan exile school system to the American education system. His reflections draw on his personal experiences as a student, teacher, and community member dedicated to education and growth.
Contact : jigme1959@gmail.com
***
Reference
- Lutz, A., Greischar, L., L., Rawlings, B., N., Ricard, M., Davidson, &. & J., R. (2004). Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0407406101
- (2025). New Research Reveals That Meditation Induces Changes in Deep Brain Areas Associated with Memory and Emotional Regulation. Mount Sinai Health System. https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2025/new-research-reveals-that-meditation induces-changes-in-deep-brain-areas-associated-with-memory-and-emotional-regulation
- (2010). APJ Abdul Kalam: Contemplative Science Complements Modern Science. The Office of His Holiness The Dalai Lama. https://www.dalailama.com/news/2010/apj abdul-kalam-contemplative-science-complements-modern-science
- Gyatso & Tenzin. (2005). The Universe in a Single Atom. Broadway Books. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Universe_in_a_Single_Atom(n.d.). Wave function collapses. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function_collapse
- Lutz, Greischar, A., Rawlings, L. L., Ricard, N. B., Davidson, M. & J., R. (2004). Long term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15534199/
- Hölzel, K., B., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, M., S., Gard, &. & T. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 191. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21071182/
- (2007). How Thinking Can Change the Brain. https://www.dalailama.com/news/2007/how-thinking-can-change-the-brain(n.d.).
Mindfulness-based stress reduction. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness based_stress_reduction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness
based_stress_reduction - Klimecki, M., O., Leiberg, Susanne, Lamm, Claus, Singer & Tania. (2013). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9. https://academic.oup.com/scan/article abstract/9/6/873/1669505
- Lama, D. (2005). The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality. Broadway Books. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/80501/the universe-in-a-single-atom-by-his-holiness-the-dalai-lama/
- (2023). Loving-kindness meditation: a tool to improve healthcare provider compassion, resilience, and patient care. Journal of Compassionate Health Care 1. https://jcompassionatehc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40639-014-0005-9



