OPINION
As international scrutiny of Chinese policies in Tibet continues to intensify, the stark contrast between a fundamentally false official propaganda and recorded traditions becomes increasingly difficult for Beijing to obscure in the face of exile Tibetans’ efforts to preserve their identity, writes Aritra Banerjee.*
In the vast Himalayan plateau where prayer flags once fluttered freely in the wind, China has systematically orchestrated one of the most comprehensive cultural propaganda campaigns of the modern era. For over seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has crafted and disseminated official narratives about Tibet that stand in stark contrast to the recorded traditions and oral histories preserved by Tibetans themselves. This analysis reveals how Beijing’s state-produced cultural programming and educational materials fundamentally distort Tibetan history, identity, and lived experience.
The Architecture of Cultural Control
China’s approach to Tibetan cultural propaganda operates through multiple interconnected channels. The state has invested heavily in institutional infrastructure designed to shape narratives about Tibet. The Tibet International Communication Center, launched in September 2024 in Lhasa, exemplifies this approach, serving as a centralised hub for global disinformation campaigns. This facility works alongside state-controlled media outlets including China Daily and China Global Television Network to disseminate sanitised versions of Tibetan culture.
The Chinese government has spent millions renovating the Tibet Museum in Lhasa alone, transforming it into a showcase for Beijing’s version of Tibetan history. These museums deliberately present “triumphant modernization” narratives that emphasise Chinese development whilst marginalising authentic Tibetan perspectives. The exhibitions consistently highlight the purported benefits of the 1951 “liberation” whilst omitting the violence and coercion that accompanied Chinese occupation.
Themes in CCP-Approved Cultural Programming
Chinese state television and cultural programming featuring Tibet follows distinct thematic patterns designed to legitimise Beijing’s rule. The 24-hour Tibetan-language television channel launched by Tibet Television Station in 2007 serves as a prime example. Despite broadcasting in Tibetan, the content consistently promotes Chinese Communist Party narratives rather than authentic Tibetan perspectives.
State-sponsored cultural shows emphasise several key themes. Programs such as “The Party Shines upon the Border,” “Affection of the Tibetans for the CCP,” “Forging Ahead in the New Era,” and “Bitter Turns to Sweet when the CCP Comes” explicitly glorify Chinese Communist Party rule. These productions present Tibetans as perpetually grateful recipients of Chinese benevolence, depicting them in a state of “perpetual joyfulness” whilst engaging in traditional dances.
Historical Revisionism in Educational Materials
Chinese textbooks and official materials systematically rewrite Tibetan history to serve Beijing’s political objectives. The primary narrative promoted in educational content claims that Tibet has been “an inalienable part of China since ancient times”. This assertion contradicts documented historical evidence, including Chinese imperial records that consistently referred to Tibet as a foreign country.
The Seventeen-Point Agreement of 1951, which China presents as evidence of voluntary integration, was in fact signed under military duress after Chinese forces invaded eastern Tibet. Yet Chinese educational materials consistently portray this as a “peaceful liberation” that Tibetans welcomed. The 14th Dalai Lama himself later stated that the agreement was thrust upon the Tibetan government and people by the threat of arms.
The Battle for Historical Truth
The fundamental tension between Chinese official narratives and recorded Tibetan traditions reflects a broader struggle over historical truth and cultural authenticity. Chinese authorities have invested enormous resources in creating alternative versions of Tibetan history, culture, and identity that serve Beijing’s political objectives. Yet these manufactured narratives consistently fail to account for the lived experiences of Tibetans themselves.
The persistence of Tibetan cultural traditions in exile communities demonstrates the failure of Chinese propaganda efforts to fully convince even the international community. Despite decades of sophisticated disinformation campaigns, the authentic voices of Tibetan culture continue to challenge and expose the fundamental contradictions in Beijing’s narrative.
The Chinese government’s increasing emphasis on “Sinicisation” policies reveals the ongoing threat that authentic Tibetan culture poses to Beijing’s control. The systematic separation of over one million Tibetan children from their families through boarding schools represents perhaps the most sinister aspect of this cultural propaganda campaign. By removing children from their cultural context and subjecting them to intensive political indoctrination, Chinese authorities hope to create a generation of Tibetans who will accept Beijing’s version of their own history and identity.
Conclusion
The comparison between Chinese official narratives and recorded Tibetan traditions reveals the extent to which Beijing has weaponised culture in service of political control. Through state-sponsored cultural programming, revised educational materials, and systematic suppression of alternative voices, China has attempted to rewrite Tibetan history and identity from the ground up.
Yet the persistence of authentic Tibetan cultural traditions in exile communities demonstrates the resilience of truth in the face of systematic propaganda. The oral histories, traditional practices, and documented experiences preserved by Tibetan communities provide an essential counternarrative to Chinese claims about Tibet’s past, present, and future.
As international scrutiny of Chinese policies in Tibet continues to intensify, the stark contrast between official propaganda and recorded traditions becomes increasingly difficult for Beijing to obscure. The authentic voices of Tibetan culture, preserved through seven decades of exile and resistance, continue to challenge the fundamental premises of Chinese rule and expose the manufactured nature of Beijing’s cultural narratives.
The battle between propaganda and truth in Tibetan cultural life ultimately represents more than a dispute over historical facts. It embodies the broader struggle between authoritarian control and human dignity, between cultural assimilation and authentic identity, between the power of the state and the resilience of the human spirit. In this contest, the recorded traditions of the Tibetan people serve as an enduring testament to the impossibility of completely erasing a culture through propaganda alone.
—
* Aritra Banerjee is a Defence, Foreign Affairs & Aerospace Journalist, Co-Author of the book ‘The Indian Navy @75: Reminiscing the Voyage’ and was the Co-Founder of Mission Victory India (MVI), a new-age military reforms think-tank. He has worked in TV, Print and Digital media, and has been a columnist writing on strategic affairs for national and international publications. His reporting career has seen him covering major Security and Aviation events in Europe and travelling across Kashmir conflict zones. Twitter: @Aritrabanned