OPINION
Aritra Banerjee* examines Beijing’s cognitive-warfare strategy in Tibet through the lens of strategic communication, drawing on Dr Neville Bolt’s formulation of “the continual calibration of persuasion and coercion, of friendship and force.” It traces how boarding schools, relocation policy, propaganda, and digital surveillance form a single narrative architecture—and then sets out a practical doctrine for what Tibetans can do now: build a global verification network, invest in pre-bunking and media literacy, speak in the languages of power, own the visual narrative, and institutionalise strategic communication within the CTA.
Beijing no longer needs to fire a shot in Tibet. Its most potent weapon today is narrative—crafted through classrooms, cameras, and code. The plateau is not just militarised; it is being narratively re-engineered. From boarding-school dormitories to WeChat timelines, China’s information warfare in Tibet has matured into an all-encompassing strategy aimed at changing not just what the world thinks of Tibet, but what Tibetans think of themselves.
A Quiet Revolution in the Classroom
In the heart of Qinghai’s Golog prefecture, thousands of Tibetan children now live in newly built boarding schools, hundreds of kilometres from their homes. A Le Monde investigation in April 2025 found students as young as six compelled to learn and think in Mandarin, their ancestral tongue reduced to an elective. Lessons on history praise the Party for “liberating” Tibet; textbooks omit the Dalai Lama entirely.
Human Rights Watch’s 2024 report, Educate the Masses to Change Their Minds, revealed the broader design: enforced relocations of entire rural communities, repackaged as “ecological protection” and “poverty alleviation.” Families are moved from grasslands into settlement clusters under surveillance grids. Together, these policies ensure that future generations are born, schooled, and socialised within a Chinese informational environment.
This is the essence of cognitive warfare—not censorship alone, but construction: rewriting the mental architecture of a people.
Strategic Communication with Chinese Characteristics
As Dr Neville Bolt, Founder and Director of the Sympodium Institute for Strategic Communications, defines it, strategic communication is “the continual calibration of persuasion and coercion, of friendship and force.”
Dr Bolt—who spent two decades as Director of the King’s Centre for Strategic Communications (KCSC) and Reader in Strategic Communications at King’s College London—now serves as Editor-in-Chief of Defence Strategic Communications, NATO’s peer-reviewed academic journal, and holds visiting positions at the University of Tokyo and St Edmund’s College, Cambridge.
Nowhere is that calibration more visible than in Tibet. Beijing’s persuasion is the promise of progress; its coercion is the price of dissent. Inside Tibet, propaganda and policing reinforce one another: persuasion arrives through television dramas, “poverty-relief” documentaries, and model-village tours that showcase dancing villagers and gleaming highways. Coercion follows through digital surveillance, grid-based neighbourhood committees, and predictive-policing algorithms trained on monastery attendance and online behaviour.
Outside Tibet, a parallel campaign unfolds. Chinese state media saturate the global information space with glossy footage of “modern Xizang,” influencers are flown to Lhasa to vlog “authentic Tibetan life,” and official embassies denounce any critical coverage as “anti-China fabrication.” This is the Easternisation of narrative power—China presenting itself as the arbiter of Asian modernity while relegating Tibetan voices to the margins.
The Human Cost of Narrative Control
Information warfare in Tibet manifests in lived experience:
- Monks compelled to denounce the Dalai Lama on camera.
- Villagers posting daily loyalty pledges on WeChat to avoid suspicion.
- Diaspora activists receiving phishing messages masquerading as news updates from relatives.
Every act of expression is both monitored and moulded. Over time, the boundary between self-expression and self-censorship blurs. The intended outcome is psychological fatigue—a population that no longer dares to imagine alternatives.
Turning the Mirror: What Tibet Can Do
Tibet’s strength has always been moral and cultural. Yet moral clarity alone cannot withstand algorithmic occupation. Tibetans—in exile and in diaspora—need a strategic-communications doctrine of their own, built on credibility, speed, and collaboration.
1. Build a Global Tibetan Information Network
Unify the scattered efforts of NGOs, monasteries, journalists, and tech volunteers into a real-time verification and archiving hub. Develop a Tibetan Open Evidence Platform—cloud-based, multilingual, sourcing verified images, satellite data, and testimonies. Ensure bilingual outputs (Tibetan–Mandarin–English) so that truth travels both eastward and westward. Incorporate open-source intelligence (OSINT) methods to document relocations, cultural erasures, and environmental impacts.
2. Invest in Pre-bunking and Media Literacy
Rather than only debunking China’s propaganda, Tibetans must inoculate audiences before disinformation hits. Train youth groups and educators across Dharamshala, Kathmandu, and Europe to recognise manipulation techniques—staged imagery, linguistic framing, emotional triggers. Launch a Digital Monastery initiative: online courses blending Buddhist epistemology with modern critical-thinking and digital-literacy skills. Understanding how illusion operates—both in philosophy and in media—is itself resistance.
3. Speak in the Languages of Power
Global visibility requires multilingual fluency. Publish and broadcast not only in English, but also in Mandarin, Hindi, and Bahasa Indonesia—the languages of the surrounding region. Recruit bilingual Tibetans as communicators to counter Chinese-language propaganda within Asian online spaces. Collaborate with independent Chinese journalists and academics sympathetic to truth rather than ideology; shared credibility multiplies reach.
4. Own the Visual Narrative
Visuals persuade where reports do not. Curate professional-grade documentaries and VR reconstructions of monasteries, landscapes, and rituals now off-limits inside Tibet. Partner with diaspora filmmakers and digital artists to recreate what cannot be filmed—an act of narrative preservation that keeps cultural memory alive for global audiences.
5. Institutionalise Strategic Communication
Establish a Tibetan Strategic Communication Council within the Central Tibetan Administration—a small, agile unit coordinating media strategy, rapid-response messaging, and partnerships with think tanks. Its mission: anticipate rather than react. When Beijing releases a “white paper,” the Council should already have pre-bunks ready—data sheets, testimonies, infographics, and quotes from neutral scholars.
Why This Fight Matters
Tibet’s struggle is not merely territorial or religious; it is civilisational. It asks whether a small culture, armed only with truth and memory, can survive the most sophisticated information apparatus ever built by an authoritarian state.
If Tibet can evolve from being narrated to narrating itself—coherently, credibly, and creatively—it will do more than defend its identity; it will offer a democratic model of strategic communication for oppressed peoples worldwide.
From Silence to Signal
In the Buddhist tradition, silence can be sacred. But in the digital age, silence becomes erasure. Strategic communication is therefore not a betrayal of humility—it is the defence of truth through clarity.
Beijing’s algorithms may patrol the plateau, but they cannot yet comprehend compassion, humour, irony, or the moral power of an authentic story. Every Tibetan tweet, podcast, or artwork that speaks without fear chips away at the architecture of control.
The war for Tibet’s story will not be won by volume but by veracity. The task now is to make truth louder than propaganda—and too interconnected to be deleted.
—
Aritra Banerjee is a Defence, Foreign Affairs & Aerospace Journalist and co-author of The Indian Navy @75: Reminiscing the Voyage. Having spent his formative years in the United States before returning to India, he combines a global outlook with on-the-ground insight in his reporting. He holds a Master’s in International Relations, Security & Strategy from O.P. Jindal Global University, a Bachelor’s in Mass Media from the University of Mumbai, and Professional Education in Strategic Communications, and Grand Strategy from King’s College London (King’s Institute for Applied Security Studies). With experience across television, print, and digital media.